This Show is *OVER!*
- Posted by Chris on February 28th, 2008 filed in 2008 election, Barack Obama, General, Politics
One of the reasons I am not afraid of Big Bad Barack is that I know eventually he has to actually open his mouth and say what he thinks. Well, here is one right here. Enjoy!
Think about this. He had a lot of time to make this video. There were no live cameras. No audience people staring at him. No Tim Russert quizzing him. No opposing candidate glaring at him. Just his writers, his handlers and Mr. Obama. So, in this no pressure setting, what does Barack say? Does he say he will make our problems disappear? Does reassure us that he’ll be there with a hug and a Popsicle when we skin our knees? Something someone with a brain would do? No, he doesn’t. He starts with the usual “end the war” bore, and then he says he’ll cut defense. Typical libtard.  He will eliminate those pesky missile defense programs. You know, the one that can hit a satellite the size of a bus before it enters the atmosphere? I am sure China and Iran are happy to hear that their sub-standard missiles will not be unfairly beat upon by our superior technology as they hurtle toward New York and California.  Then again, maybe that isn’t so bad. Hmm. Anyway, I digress. Let’s continue.Â
After killing our missile defense, he will continue to make sure we’re not bullies any more. How?  Well, he will not “weaponize” space. I am sure Taiwan and Japan are really happy to know that we won’t be competing with the Chi-coms for weapon development. I mean after all, you don’t want a strong person protecting you against attackers. That’s not nice. I am sure that China is glad to hear that they will be alone in having the missiles in space pointing at the Earth. Then again, everything else is made there, why not the only space attack system? After all, I am sure they just want to hunt terrorists too. Right? They are such nice people.
Now that’s rich, of course, but here are the money lines. The lines that just gave us victory. The lines we need to ram down his throat every chance we get. You see, he is going to work for a world without nukes, rid the world of the production of fission material and negotiate with the Russians to get rid of all the missiles. Huh? Is he running for president or for Miss America? I’m surprised he didn’t throw in world peace and no bullies in the schools. Miss South Carolina was ragged mercilessly for this answer. Her answer is brilliant compared to this. No nukes? Talk about a hippie fantasy. Why stop there? Why not no homeless, eliminating poverty and what ever other left wing fantassy (yes, fantassy since only an ass would think it possible) you can dream up?Â
This is what he says when he can think under no pressure. What will happen when he gets into the debates and has to answer for them? Or when someone sticks a mic in his face and asks a tough question? The media will not do that without pressure. We need to apply that pressure. Embarrass the media enough and they will start showing the real Obama.  We need to get his real views to everyone we know who supports Obama and doesn’t think the guy is a left wing lunatic. Reagan democrats will wake out of their Obamacoma real fast when they see this and his opposition to the Infant Born Alive Protection Act in Illinois.  We need to get people to show up to his town hall meetings and ask him about these goodies and get video of his answers on the net. We do that and we will destroy him.
One newscaster under Obama’s spell says that Obama represents everyone’s dreams of their future. I love crushing hippie dreams.  All we have to do is our part and Obama is gone and the hippies will cry in their water bongs.
Thank you to LC 0311 crunchie I.M.H. at the Rott for putting up the video.
Lance says:
I sure hope your right!!
I have never felt that our safety & survival was is such jeopardy as this
prezzy campaign!
Osamabama & his ‘handlers’ have done a brilliant job of snowing so many americans bout hope & change & creating the Obamessiah myth!
Every day I’m finding more articles & posts about why we don’t want Osamabame in the gubbmint or even this country!!
FWIW………………..Lance
Stix says:
Obamarama and his ilk would let the Middle East grow into a cess pool of Islamo-fascism and would grab the ankles and wait for us to be attacked and then send the bad police after him you see Terrorism is a criminal activity and does not need to have the military involved with the Defeatocrats. They will use the sae policy of Clinton and kill a few goats and deatroy some tents while the terrorists draw up there next attack against us.
And we can all sing kumbaya together and do some finger painting together with Osama bin Laden adn the Mullocracy in Iran. it will be great and we acna just wait for New York to go u in a mushroom cloud
Lord Bitememan says:
Call me crazy, but I almost want to give him a chance to do it. Why? He’s sounding a lot like Jimmy Carter, and look what direction the country took next election after we got Carter.
Stix says:
Yes that willbe really good forthecountry ot let Obamrama dstroy it. That kakes a lotof sense. This is not1976 and we swill not have another 1980. Atleastin 1976 we had Reagan, who do we got now???? Romney, Huckabe, Ron Paul. See Reagan just lost the nomination but he hada following and a plan to bring the country back. Who do we got now?? Thompson maybe, but he will be 69 in the next election. Hunter, another maybe, but he did not even get a delegate when he ran.
Do not fool yourself that electing Obamarama will brin the mext Reagan. There was only 1 Reagan and we do not have another one inthe wings right now.
I know your feelings and wish we actually had a good conservative, but that is not going to happen and McCain is who the MSM picked for us, becasue we are all disjointed rght now.
sara crompton says:
hey dude, i’m a hippie, and i think Obama is SCARY.
Life is precious, and he’s very pro-death. I don’t think a lot of people know that-they hear the rhetoric and don’t research.
You want to know my hippie dream-Bobby JIndal, 2012!
I’m really going to miss Bush, too. I am so thankful for what he’s done for Iraq and Africa.
Lord Bitememan says:
Stix, I’d say you give too much credibility to one man’s ability to damage this country. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think an Obama presidency would be good for the country in the short run, but it wouldn’t destroy the country. This country has had presidents both good and bad, and we have seen neither utopia nor destruction as a result of either lot. The only president who comes close to the “destruction” column is James Buchanan, so unless states start seceding under an Obama presidency, I venture a guess that any damage he does is a temporary blip on the radar of time.
No, I don’t want him to win in November, I’m just saying for the longterm health of the party this guy could accomplish a lot. First and foremost the left is motivated this time around. I’ve seen this sort of motivation before on the right too, and it took 8 years of a Democrat in office to get us there. Nothing motivates a party more than an exile from the White House, and nothing pacifies more than control of the same. Were Obama to win in 2008, the record turnout numbers in the Democratic contests would plummet just from the satisfaction of having their way (assuming there would even be a contest). In contrast, losing the White House might be a good kick in the pants for Republicans to stop the in-fighting and get motivated to go out and reclaim it and the houses of Congress.
A second point to consider is that perceived failure in the opposition advances our electability. Harry Truman cut the military and refused to engage in a serious war effort in Korea, and thus we got 8 years of President Eisenhower. Carter cut the military and pulled support for the Shah, and we got 8 years of Reagan. Clinton bungled Somalia and tried to socialize medicine, and we got 12 years of control of congress. Militaries can be rebuilt. Our nation has this dynamism and the resources to put it to good use. Tin pot dictators can be walled up and contained in perpetuity, we proved this with Cuba and North Korea. Certainly Obama’s rhetoric is naive and optimistic about the world, but we’ve had such presidents before in more dangerous times than now, and I’ll take our current threats over that of the Soviet Union in the height of the Cold War any day.
We don’t need another Reagan. Reagan belonged to another time. Nor do I see any need to have a rising star of perennial contests waiting in the wings to come into his own. Historically that has scantly been the case. In 1892 they were busy focussing on the candidates of 1892, not grooming William McKinley for an eventual 1896 run, and Teddy Roosevelt was unheard of. In 1916 Charles Evans Hughes was the most prominant Republican of his day, nobody had even heard of Warren Harding. In 1948 the big question for the next one was if Thomas Dewey was the best they could do or if the conservative wing might get a crack at it. Nobody had even considered that Eisenhower would step up to the plate. In 1996 it certainly wasn’t clear that George W. Bush would be the almost universal choice of the party for the 2000 election, and indeed that wasn’t really cemented till 1998. So no, we don’t need an heir appearant waiting in the wings with a master plan to a generation of Republican dominance. In all liklihood that leader is out there right now, doing his job, waiting for time to unfold before he steps up to the plate. For all you know 2012, if we lose in 2008, might be the election where Obama is beated by David Petraeus, or perhaps America’s first black president will be succeeded by America’s first Indian president, Bobby Jindal. Just because the current crop of candidates doesn’t suggest the next candidate doesn’t mean we don’t have another Teddy Roosevelt in our midst. We just might not know it yet.
Beth says:
LB, the problem with that theory is that Obama is THEIR Reagan. He stands to bring about a new age of strength in the left wing, just as Reagan revived conservatism.
Also, I’m just not willing to let Obama or Hillary gut the military during wartime. There are too many men and women who have sacrificed everything to leave them to a Commander in Chief like Obama or Hillary, who see them merely as political pawns in their rhetorical game. I don’t want Iraq to become the Killing Fields Redux, and I don’t want Iraq to become Iran Annex A. Not only will more American lives be lost as a result, potentially millions of Iraqi lives will as well. Of course, I know I’m preaching to the choir about the dangers of leaving Iraq, but the Commander in Chief is the most important job of the President, as far as I’m concerned.
I also don’t see a bad four years of Hillobama bringing on a resurgence of conservatism, because we don’t have another movement leader waiting in the wings. If anything, John McCain, of all people, can do that–he can bring in independents and moderates who might otherwise look leftward. You can’t feed the fish until you catch ‘em, so to speak, and McCain can catch them. I agree, we don’t need to have another Reagan–but we do need to make the Republican Party look attractive again. Of ANY of the candidates, McCain is uniquely suited to the task, because of his (occasionally brutal) honesty, his character, his emphasis on ethical government, his disdain of the importance of moneymoneymoney vs. issues in politics and elections, his courage, and his life of selfless service to this country. Even those who disagree with him politically (well, except for the MDS-far-right conservatives and the crazy far-left, anyway, but they’re hopeless) respect him.
The last several years have been really bad for the GOP and conservatism in general, with all the scandals (fair or not) and the party in-fighting. We NEED someone who can represent us to the world better than others have, because our IDEAS have become discredited by some of the people on the right (not because the ideas themselves have failed). I don’t mean President Bush, of course–I still think he’s a great President whom history will find was right–but he certainly doesn’t enjoy broad support. Iraq has a lot to do with that, but the ethical scandals of the last few years in the GOP have made things worse for him, simply because he’s the #1 Republican. For example, Jack Abramoff = Bush to the simple-minded, and unfortunately, that descrbes a lot of people. James Dobson = Bush. Larry Craig = Bush.
That’s one reason I support McCain–his ethics and character define him, and it’s far more difficult to redefine a man who has such a long history of service.
Lord Bitememan says:
Heh, I don’t know about Obama being their Reagan (the Gipper, after all, for as idealistic as he may have sounded at the time was deeply rooted in the pragmatics of what he was going to do, not just the dreams of what he’d like to do), but if we are to believe Dick Morris’ commentary:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_commentary/commentary_by_dick_morr...
The Democrats are making a choice between their new Kennedy (optimistic lightweight orator) and a new Nixon (that one speaks for itself). I remember in Oliver Stone’s “Nixon” there was a scene where Nixon sees a picture of JFK and remarks “When they look at you they see everything they’d like to be. When they look at me they see everything they are.” I wonder if Hillary is thinking that about now.
raz0r says:
Take the vid. Add the following at the end.
This is what he wants to do with the greatest country on Earth. Do you trust him and the Democrats? Neither do we. Vote Republican this November.
Purple Avenger says:
I’m dreaming of a pony, and Obama has promised me one. I believe him