SNL Lampoons the Little Hairy Hitler, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
- Posted by Beth (Blue Star Chronicles) on October 1st, 2007 filed in Iran, Islamofascism
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared there are no homosexuals in Iran when he was invited to speak to the effete elite at Columbia University.
He had them at ‘I hate America and there was no holocaust!’ but lost them at the ‘We don’t have homosexuals’.
Now they are falling all over themselves to explain what the meaning of ‘is’ is …. I mean what he really meant by saying there are no homosexuals in Iran. It turns out that its academically respectable! HEH!
I wonder how the trolls at Sadly, Simpleminded! feel about ‘academically respectable’. They didn’t like Dan Rather’s ‘fake but accurate’ at all. Well, they liked Dan Rather’s ‘fake but accurate’ but didn’t like a conservative depicting anything as ‘fake but accurate‘. Its all about what the meaning of ‘is’ is. See?
To understand the logic you have to twist things around every which away and then twist it back and over the top and then you might have some clue as to how their minds work. But probably not.
The thing is, it puts them in a bind when they have to hate someone who hates America and Israel. It just goes against what they believe in so they have to come up with some sort of justification for his words and actions to keep their own ideologies in tact. How can they hate Mahmoud for hating homosexuals when he hates America and Jews so much! He’s like …. well …. he’s like a mini-little-hairy-hitler!
Self-loathing is a sad sight to see, really it is.
Well, at least the comics at Saturday Night Live found humor in the whole thing. They did up a right nice video spoofing Mahmoud as having found love - of the homosexual variety - while he was in New York.
See the video here. Its HILARIOUS!!
(c/p BSC)
Sadly, No! Customer Services says:
S,N!: Golly, this photo is faked.
BETH: Oh yeah? What about Dan Rather? Fake-but accurate, fake-but-accurate, meaning of ‘is’ is, Clintonesque, Dan Rather. Ha-ha. You approve of Dan Rather and he is your best friend.
S,N!: Um, what in the world are you talking about?
[SEVERAL NEWS CYCLES LATER]
BETH: Ahmadinejad, Dan Rather, fake-but accurate, meaning of ‘is’ is, fake-but-accurate, Dan Rather, Clintonesque, ha-ha! You love Dan Rather and want to marry him.
S,N!: Um, are you completely sane?
Beth says:
Gavin, she certainly seems to have struck a nerve with you. And you’re questioning her sanity?!
LOL!
- Beth (not BSC Beth)
Sadly, No! Customer Services says:
You know, I could do the same thing here. Beth could post something on…I don’t know, Iraq or something, and I could post a ‘rebuttal’ like “Iraq! What about the BARBECUE SAUCE?! Haha! Iraq-not-barbecue, meaning of ’sauce,’ you love BARBECUE SAUCE!”
And she’d be like, “What in the world are you talking about? Who mentioned barbecue sauce?”
And then I’d be like, “Ooooh, you love the barbecue sauce. As I explained, YOU have to twist things around every which away and then twist it back and over the top. Meaning of ’sauce,’ Clinton, I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I.”
And eventually I suppose someone would have to come and carry me away. Unlike Beth, who is apparently living without vital supervision.
beth says:
I don’t know Beth, they can’t seem to comprehend that there’s more than one Beth on the planet.
Still - gavin - its been a few days and I’ve not thought about it since my last visit to the Sadly, Narcissistic! blog - but it seems to me that the little commenters over there are the ones who brought up the ‘fake but accurate’ hullabaloo.
It doesn’t really matter - that whole group over there talks in circles. Y’all are the ones that linked to and started trolling around my blog - not the other way around. I didn’t even know Sadly, Nominal! existed until y’all started stalking me.
And gavin I am Beth from Blue Star Chronicles. The woman who has this blog is also Beth, but a different Beth. We are friends and we both just happen to have the same first name. That doesn’t mean we are the same person. We are two different people. Are you able to understand that or do I need to type it slower to let it sink in?
Sadly, No! Customer Services says:
Um, Beth, you seem to be the one talking in circles here. Allow me to summarize my position in a way that will be difficult to misunderstand.
1) The Code Pink picture was phony.
2) Your friend LindoSOG, who also posts at this blog, came by and posted the following comment:
3) You’ve been running around telling a weird story about a ‘discussion’ that we’ve supposedly been having about Dan Rather vis-s-vis the Code Pink banner, in which we use Clintonesque definitions of the meaning of ‘is.’
Allow me to be plain here, ma’am: I think you’re trying to fool your readers into thinking something that isn’t true.