SourceWatch, PRWatch, CMD, John Stauber, and “Artificial Intelligence” can take their blogad and ram it up their asses
Tags: blogads, the left, wikipedia, pr watch, propaganda, wikipedia sucks
I guess they think I’m some kind of moron, like I wouldn’t recognize the name Stauber, or that I’d be fooled by “Right Wing” in the contact info for the Blogad they wanted to buy here? Or that I wouldn’t look at the ad and see who the buyer is? That’s what’s funny–stupid people don’t understand that others actually do have a clue. They have no concept of it.
The SW Vets for Freedom article has managed to stir things up a bit. Caution: Could be hazardous to one’s laugh quota. Artificial Intelligence 12:35, 21 Jul 2006 (EDT)
* First: See the Wikipedia talk page on Vets for Freedom:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vets_For_Freedom
* Second, here’s the result:
http://bamapachyderm.com/archives/2006/07/13/wikipedia-sucks/
Thank you for proving my point about the bias at Wikipedia, dumbass! Note that they port entries over from Sourcewatch to Wikipedia and refuse to even discuss the bias or accuracy of that information. They’re like 9/11 conspiracy nuts with their “facts”–if something is within the realm of possibility and imagination, all sorts of things can be deemed as “facts.” Their “Sunlight Foundation” needs some sunlight shining on themselves (the whole CMD conglomerate, that is).
So I think I’ll be passing on that Blogad for your moonbat attack group. Again. Thanks anyway! (I don’t need the $25 THAT badly, y’know.)
Click thumbnails:
Hell, I’d pay them $25 to piss off, except they’d use that money to fund their left-wing propaganda/pockets-lining effort. F–k ‘em.
Blue Star Chronicles says:
Cotillion Colloquy
I was reading blogs and Cotillion emails last night, simultaneously, and thought it was a perfectly good time to blog a little about the Cotillion Colloquy. That’s how I think of it, colloquy. I mean, there is A LOT of chatter over there.
I was a…