MY Vast Right Wing Conspiracy

The Lying Islamists, Part 2

• Posted by Beth on February 7th, 2006 filed in General, Islamofascism, Mohammed Cartoons    

I could have spent my time more wisely yesterday (The Lying Islamists) by first going to Clarity and Resolve (as Vinnie did–glad you reminded me). Patrick al-Kafir (of C&R) has a glossary (The C&R Lexicon) of Islamic terminology, including taqiyya:

taqiyya: Dissimulation; lying for the sake of ones religion; concealing ones true religious beliefs for strategic reasons. Taqiyya is a lie by commission, rather than by omission, as in kitman. The concept of al-taqiyya is one historically associated with Shia Islam. This is because Sunni Muslims, who believe that Shiites are heretics, would impel them to denounce their faith, thinking this would expose them as mushrikeen when they refused to. In response, the Shia would do so, but hold true to their faith in their hearts, thus preserving their faith and their lives. Taqiyya is now used by all Muslims as a means of deceiving infidels about Islam’s aims, practices, and aspirations.

This isn’t just Patrick’s commentary, it’s based on the words of the Koran and Muslim clerics. See the entire lexicon for much more. You’ll find a lot of terms from which you can do further research. And while you’re there, Patrick also has some Bukhari hadiths about the images of Mohammed to help you understand the basis for the recent “Cartoon Violence” (I just can’t get over the term!).

Back to the lies (taqiyya).

From “Terror on the Dole,” This is London, April 2004:

But Sayful and his friends laugh at the idea that they are local pariahs. “The mosques say one thing to the public, and something else to us. Let’s just say that the face you see and the face we see are two different faces,” says Abdul Haq. “Believe me,” adds Musa, “behind closed doors, there are no moderate Muslims.”

Behind closed doors, there are no moderate Muslims.

This next piece is long (actually, it’s a collection of work), but if you are one of those useful idiots still deluding yourself in thinking that Islam “respects all religions” and that Muslims merely want a “peaceful coexistence” (honestly, I can’t understand how anyone actually still believes this), then you need to read this. Actually, anyone who hasn’t read it needs to read it. Consider it your reading assignment for today, or however long you need. I won’t quote any of it because there’s too much to excerpt, so read it all. :arrow: Taqiyya and kitman - lying for the sake of Islam

More, from Jihad Watch: Taqiyya and Tu-Quoque –

It has been quite an effort to prevent Infidels from getting the wrong (that is to say, the right) impression of Islam, at least until such time as Muslims in the West currently singing the praises of “pluralism” no longer have need for Infidel good will and tolerance. To date, the twin techniques of “Taqiyya” and Tu-Quoque have been relied on. “Taqiyya” is the religiously-sanctioned doctrine, with its origins in Shi’a Islam but now practiced by non-Shi’a as well, of deliberate dissimulation about religious matters that may be undertaken to protect Islam, and the Believers. A related term, of broader application, is “kitman,” which is defined as “mental reservation.” An example of “Taqiyya” would be the insistence of a Muslim apologist that “of course” there is freedom of conscience in Islam, and then quoting that Qur’anic verse — “There shall be no compulsion in religion.” But the impression given will be false, for there has been no mention of the Muslim doctrine of abrogation, or naskh, whereby such an early verse as that about “no compulsion in religion” has been cancelled out by later, far more intolerant and malevolent verses. In any case, history shows that within Islam there is, and always has been, “compulsion in religion” for Muslims, and for non-Muslims. The “compulsion” for Muslims comes from the treatment of apostasy as an act punishable by death. And though “dhimmis” are allowed to practice their religion, they do so under conditions of such burdens and restrictions that many, not as an act of conscience but rather as a response to inexorable Muslim pressure, have converted (or “reverted”) to Islam.

“Kitman” is close to “taqiyya,” but rather than outright dissimulation, it consists in telling only a part of the truth, with “mental reservation” justifying the omission of the rest. One example may suffice. When a Muslim maintains that “jihad” really means “a spiritual struggle,” and fails to add that this definition is a recent one in Islam (little more than a century old), he misleads by holding back, and is practicing “kitman.” When he adduces, in support of this doubtful proposition, the hadith in which Muhammad, returning home from one of his many battles, is reported to have said (as known from a chain of transmitters, or isnad), that he had returned from “the Lesser Jihad to the Greater Jihad” and does not add what he also knows to be true, that this is a “weak” hadith, regarded by the most-respected muhaddithin as of doubtful authenticity, he is further practicing “kitman.”

…
Sometimes Taqiyya is not enough. Muslim spokesmen often attempt to convince an audience of Infidels that Islam is a religion of “peace” and “tolerance.” This, nowadays, works less well than it used to, and if an audience shows signs of not being completely convinced, another tack – that of Tu-Quoque – is attempted. Now these same spokesmen, who a minute before were all sweetness-and-light, begin to attack Christianity and Judaism for their own lack of “peace” and “tolerance.” They support this attack with bloodcurdling passages from Leviticus or some obscure text, possibly attributed to a rabbi from 2500 years ago.

Read all of this as well. (It’s not as long as the last piece.)

Want more? Google taqiyya, or better yet, start reading some books from people like Ibn Warraq and other former Muslims or Muslim reformists. I’d quote lengthy passages from books I’ve read, but I’m not about to start typing THAT much. Better yet, read the Koran. I got a free one from the CAIR thugs (ha! they sent one to me!); get one for yourself and start reading it. This isn’t some bullshi’ite hobby; it’s our future, and any non-Muslim needs to get acquainted with the truth, and FAST. They want to own you, regardless of what they say to your face (or in your comment sections).

Don’t come back here spouting Islamic apologist hogwash until you’ve read about Islam. I’m sick and tired of useful idiots, and sick and tired of Islamotards that think they can pull that crap over on me.
Muslims: Don’t come here trying to claim “Islam respects all religions” because of the stupid CARTOON violence (!); everyone knows that is a blatant lie, and I know WHY you lie.
Useful idiots: you enable the enemy; therefore, you are the enemy. Willful ignorance is exactly what the enemy depends upon.

F.E.T.E.

Tags: Islam, jihad, Muslim, cartoons, taqiyya, Muhammad, Mohammed