This just pisses me off
Yeah, I guess you can tell I’m approaching the rant stage.
F–k that. THIS, though, totally pisses me off. Let some motherfarker start talking that shi’ite to MY first-grader, and I’ll rip their balls off and give them some of their own “sex questions” to think about.
That’s MY JOB, you piece of shi’ite public school “mental health counselors”–NOT YOURS.
I probably shouldn’t have read that when I was in a bad mood. Although I would be just as infuriated by it, I would probably register my outrage a little more politely. Maybe.
Just go read it, I’m too pissed off to get into the details. And you moonbats wonder why we don’t want a bunch of farking “liberal” (NOT) judges on the bench…God, you’re stupid.
P.S. Anyone who wants to bitch about my language will be banned. I’m not in the mood for your bullshi’ite, and I’m not kidding.
Muzik says:
Wow.
I’m as pissed as you are about this, Beth. I’ll bet you can find a bit of child porn at this counselor’s home.
That said;
I’m going out on the proverbial limb to say something about your language and you can ban me if you want but I found it to be pretty hot. Especially in the context of sexual surveys. Have you ever considered writing erotic fiction?
I’m kidding, of course.
sigmund, carl and alfred says:
Yes dear, of course dear, whatever you say dear.
Save this comment- you won’t hear me say that very often.
Yup, I read the piece. We are approaching the point if no return- this cannot be allowed to go on.
MCPO Airdale says:
The 9th Circuit is the most overturned Circuit Court in the land. Let’s hope this case doesn’t make it to SCOTUS until Aunt Sandy is back on the ranch in Texas.
BTW If the parents in this community don’t throw out the entire School Board in the next election, the Child Services folks ought to look into their capacity to act as parents.
Merri Musings says:
Beth - it’s our farking tax dollars at work. What a bunch of fucktards! There’s NO ONE out there that will tell me I’m not 100% responsible for assuring my child is shielded from this inappropriate, borderline pornographic rhetoric. Bastards.
P.S. I like coming here…I can swear like you and not feel out of place. :twisted:
Hardcore Conservative says:
What do expect it was The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that handed down that ruling the most wacked out court in the country
Beth says:
I KNOW it’s the 9th, that’s why I said WE DON’T WANT these kinds of judges!
And I’m with MCPO, if those parents don’t boot the school board, they’re stupid and lazy, not to mention negligent parents.
Hardcore Conservative says:
Beth,
in order to rip the balls off a liberal you’d have tou use an electronic microscope
In other news I heard the french police are surrendering to the protestors
Alli says:
I don’t expect much else from the 9th Circus these days. *sigh* Rant on Beth… this shi’ite is wrong. just…. wrong.
basil's blog says:
Breakfast: 11/4/2005
Try one of these specials with your breakfast:
Not Exactly Rocket Science says you can help a wounded soldier
Congressman Jack Kingston (R-GA 1) (RedState.org) reports HR 1606 (the Online Freedom of Speech Act) failed
Beth (MY VRWC) is upset with…
Vince Aut Morire says:
Why Some Clowns Are Scary
Especially when said clowns belong to the 9th Circus Court…
Wild Thing says:
OMG oh NOooooooooooo
God help us what the hell has happened in this world!!!!!
Beth I don’t blame you one bit for being furious and for any kind of language you want to use. I swear I think the world is totally turned upside down. If anyone tried to do this to kids when I was growing up , well hell no one would have even tried back then I am sure.
When I was growing up I asked my Daddy what politically correct meant and he explained it to me, then he said something that I will never forget………”Chrissie, one day it will be PC that will ruin this great country. It will be used by the Democrats and liberals to get away with anything they want to do. I pray I am wrong but it concerns your Dad a lot.”
He was so right, the left would never get away with half the things they do to kids, to our Military etc. if we did not have PC existing!!!!!!!
Beth, I have a neice and nephew that are Autistic and one day last year their parents found out and (other parents too) , that some of the Autistic children had been touched and more to some of the children, by some of the staff at the school. Ausistic children can’t even describe what happened. My nephew cannot even say words yet but my neice can draw a picture and say Bus or dog etc. But she could not tell about it either. They found out because one of the little girls had blood and some scratches down below.
Beth I am sorry I got off track sharing that but it just shows how sick this world is……the teacher that did the bad things is still at school and the parents are having a heck of a time getting him fired. Needless to say the ones involved all took their kids out of that school immediatley.
I agree with everything you said Beth!
Simon says:
Beth,
I know you don’t want to hear this, BUT…
While it is true that it’s sometimes hard to determine whether the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is an appellate court or a satirical comedy routine, a histrionic reductio ad absurdum of liberal jurisprudence, and while it is also true that the reasoning in this case (Fields v. Palmdale School District) is horrific and flawed, the court’s decision was correct.
Field et al alleged, inter alia, that the school’s action’s violated their [federal] Constitutional right to privacy. Where have we heard this before? Right, it’s the basis for the holding in Roe v. Wade, Lawrence v. Texas, and any number of other (less high-profile) Supreme Court (and, for that matter, Ninth Circuit) decisions that conservatives hate. There is no federal Constitutional right to general “privacy”. Specific privacy rights are protected, yes - and, indeed, the enumeration of particular privacy rights denies the existence of a general privacy right.
As Justice Scalia explained, dissenting from Troxel v. Granville:
We cannot have it both ways. Either there is a Constitutional right to privacy, in which case Fields was wrongly decided, but Roe, Lawrence et al were correctly decided, or there is not a Constitutional right to privacy, in which case it is the responsibility of the citizens of each state to ensure that their laws protect those rights they deem in need of protection - including who gets to give their children sex education and at what age.
If one wants to stop decisions like this, one doesn’t want Originalists or strict constructionists on the bench - one wants conservatives, and conservative judicial activists at that. I don’t like this conclusion any more than you do - but there is no federal question here, and the Ninth Circuit’s decision was therefore correct.
The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns says:
The Not So Daily, Daily Best Reads
Funny: French To Add Rioting As Quintessential To French Identity [by Point Five] Burrito brawl! [by Moonbat Monitor] Political Cartoon of the Week [by The Waterglass] Will You Go To Prom With Me? (VIDEO) [by DevilDucky] (H/T The Meatriarchy) Blogger…
Beth says:
Simon, that’s fair, and thanks for pointing that out.
Here’s my beef:
The district court dismissed the federal causes of action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and dismissed the state claims without prejudice to their right to re-file in state court. We agree, and hold that there is no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children, either independent of their right to direct the upbringing and education of their children or encompassed by it. We also hold that parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students.
I’m no lawyer, I just know that on the face of it, it’s outrageous to me that the 9th (and the District court) opinion that I have no right to determine who raises (if you will) my child. “Fundamental right?” OK, it’s not something spelled out in the Constitution, but then neither does the Constitution say the government (public schools) are to teach my child about things like this. It just seems to me that in a public school district, the will of the parents should prevail.
If not, then it just adds to my argument for the abolition of the Department of Education, and at the very least, my belief that public schools nowadays are only partially in the business of educating the 3 R’s, and more interested in indoctrinating children with crap that has nothing whatsoever to do with real education.
Anyway, this is the danger with my getting pissed about court rulings–I’m not a legal scholar, so I don’t (can’t) dispute the rulings on their legal merit; I’m reacting to this as a parent. I understand what you (and Scalia) say, but what the 9th said (italicized above) makes no sense. I know I’m oversimplifying it, but I also know that most Americans wouldn’t be able to analyze the legal merits–but would likely also find the idea of having no right to decide who gives their own children sex ed (and other subjects) utterly reprehensible.
Maureen says:
Crappy court and legal mumbo jumbo aside, have any of you met a school counselor lately? As a teacher I can tell you that all the one’s I’ve come in contact with are FREAKS who do more harm than good. At my school we hear shi’ite like, “We can’t suspend Johnny, even though he’s cracking kids on the head with dictionaries and setting fires to the bathroom because he has gender identity issues.” I swear to you I am NOT making (most of) this up. So when I read about this crap yesterday, I can’t say that I was surprised that the survey was done in the first place.
idiotsilas says:
Just another reason to have a constitutional admendment allowing the people to remove them from the bench.
They answer to no one and are therefore accountable to no one.
That is entirely too much power. Elected for life…HA!
I wish I could get a job, screw it up, and still be able to show up until the the day I die.
Conservative Cat says:
Bonfire of the Vanities #123 - Approximation of Failure
Welcome to the 123rd Bonfire of the Vanities. The Bonfire is a chance for bloggers to expose themselves to ridicule in a controlled environment. It is not a tool for me to stroke my own ego at the expense of…
Aaron's cc: says:
My daughters (17, 15, 13 and 11) do not go to a school where such questions would be asked. They’re evidence that it’s still possible to raise kids with some innocence. Religious girls’ school helps.
If you think access to MTV and dating before graduating high school are NECESSARY, you’re too liberal to have access to my kids without me in the room. Face the facts… dating is sexual PRACTICE. Intimacy and variety are inversely proportional. Would you like a spouse who has had a dozen previous partners or one who’d have intimate memories only of you and a passion and willingness to learn?
Tes, the fashion trend from feminine voluptuousness to 12-year-old boy figures is a descent to ancient Greek mores and aesthetics. We are heading rapidly into the NAMBLA territory that was inevitable when the light-shoed gained control of fashion and entertainment.
Teachers like that are the dupes of neo-primitive pedophiles who’d like to return children to chattel.
We blog but we don’t get in the faces of our family, friends and neighbors dare we look… intolerant. I don’t just want these teachers and judges to be quiet, I want them deported to Canada.
Probably a good reason for them to be pushing to ban guns in San Francisco in Tuesday’s election. Clearly, someone’s nervous.