Letter to the terrorists
A Letter To The Terrorists, From London
What the fark do you think you’re doing?
This is London. We’ve dealt with your sort before. You don’t try and pull this on us.
Do you have any idea how many times our city has been attacked? Whatever you’re trying to do, it’s not going to work.
All you’ve done is end some of our lives, and ruin some more. How is that going to help you? You don’t get rewarded for this kind of crap.
And if, as your MO indicates, you’re an al-Qaeda group, then you’re out of your tiny minds.
Because if this is a message to Tony Blair, we’ve got news for you. We don’t much like our government ourselves, or what they do in our name. But, listen very clearly. We’ll deal with that ourselves. We’re London, and we’ve got our own way of doing things, and it doesn’t involve tossing bombs around where innocent people are going about their lives.
And that’s because we’re better than you. Everyone is better than you. Our city works. We rather like it. And we’re going to go about our lives. We’re going to take care of the lives you ruined. And then we’re going to work. And we’re going down the pub.
So you can pack up your bombs, put them in your arseholes, and get the fark out of our city.
* clap * * clap * * clap *
Via Tim Worstall.
I found other UK bloggers linked there, and I’ll just say I’m pretty farkin’ disgusted with some of ‘em (blaming Bush/Blair/the West in general, as expected). Drooling idiots. I won’t even bother reading our own moonbats. Tim Worstall says:
May I just remind you of one of those little rules that we have in our civilised society? We bury the dead and console the bereaved before we start making asinine political points.
Stiff upper lip there, indeed.
Speed of Thought says:
Round the Reader - London Edition…
Sad Thursday…
My reader has been, as it should be, full of coverage of the London Terror attacks. The best round-ups I’ve see are at Backcountry Conservative, In the Bullpen and at InstaPundit. Just scroll.
tony martin says:
Did anyone really think we’d be safer after attacking Iraq? This proves we are not. Instead of defeating al Qaeda, Bush took the war in a different direction, the direction to recruit 10 times more bin ladens. Idiots!
Mike says:
RE: Tony Martins previous comment:
When do you actually take a stand against someone trying to hurt or kill those who you love, or yourself??? Im sorry that life isnt peachy-keen and flowers and roses…sometimes you need to face up to reality….Muslim radicals are out to kill us and destroy our way of life….and all they understand is Violence…plain and simple…and if that is all they understand then so be it…it sickens me, but it’s reality…you need to get your head out of the clouds and see the forrest for the trees….Man, I know living in San Fran is a brain rotting experience, but look at what is going on…I’ll admit that Iraq isnt the best place for a stand, but at least it’s a stand…and it is making a difference….whether you believe it or not…If we can establish a presence over there, then we can start to make a change and start to eliminate a global threat….
Aaron's cc: says:
“So you can pack up your bombs, put them in your arseholes, and get the fuck out of our city.”
The innumerate Brits slept while 600,000 came in. I don’t think that England has a CLUE about the volume of infestation.
The answer to Tony is to level a mosque and erect a Church, Synagogue or Internet Cafe and name it for each Western soldier and civilian killed fighting the Al Qaedists. Until it costs Islam more than they can possibly gain, until Muslim mothers would sooner “go Kathy Bates” on their sons than let them listen to the monstrous mullahs (remember the scene from Misery?), the West is twiddling its thumbs and drooling at MTV while the likelihood of dhimmification advances rapidly.
The answer, and if you read my piece British Resolve? I Wouldn’t Count On It yesterday, is to heed the wisdom of the Japanese pacifist movement of WWII who WELCOMED Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The brief immediate collateral damage hastened Japanese surrender and saved a far greater number of innocents on both sides had the war remained conventional.
In the choice between bad and worse, it’s immoral to remain neutral… moreso if worse is advancing.
Dude, Where's The Beach? - My Hitchhikers Guide To The World says:
Mr Snrub says:
Aaron’s CC is a troll, right?
Right? :shock:
Speed of Thought... says: